I was wondering if this made sense. Did I hear Paul say that he wouldn't put 2.4 million into it himself, but if it was subsidized it would be worth it? I'd like to hear more on that -- is there some way he would better spend that kind of funding?

Then I wonder if a 750-cow farm makes good sense, in terms of land use, health, environment, etc. Obviously the Millers have a lot of sunk costs -- I don't know how easily they could change their business model -- but at arms length, as a citizen or town manager of some sort, I'd want to think through our priorities separately and see if they jive with the Millers' plans.

There's a long discussion on biogas here: http://anz.theoildrum.com/node/3633
Quite long, with interesting tangents, some kernels of wisdom, and a bit of the usual online mudslinging. On the whole the discussion is supportive of biogas as a good way to produce energy locally.

And a little data from Cornell here:
http://www.reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpag...